| TEA Manual 7/1/97 |
8100 TEA
Disqualifications - Intentional Program Violation
A determination of an intentional program violation (IPV) is
made either through a court of law or by a hearing officer in an internal hearing process.
The internal hearing is known as an Administrative Disqualification Hearing. Penalties in
the form of disqualification sanctions are imposed against individuals found guilty of an
IPV through a court of law or by a hearing officer in an Administrative Disqualification
Hearing. |
| TEA Manual 7/1/97 |
8101 Definition of
Intentional Program Violation (IPV)
An intentional program
violation of the TEA Program is defined as an action by an individual for the purpose of
establishing or maintaining the familys eligibility for TEA or increasing or
preventing a decrease in the amount of the grant which is intentionally:
- A false or misleading statement, misrepresentation, concealment, or
withholding of facts; or
- Any act intended to mislead, misrepresent, conceal or withhold facts,
or propound a falsity.
An IPV determination can be made only through the
Administrative Disqualification Hearing process or by a court of law. County Office staff
will not make IPV determinations. |
|
| TEA Manual 7/1/97 |
8102 Disqualification
Sanction - Intentional Program Violation (IPV)
The family of any
individual who pleads guilty or nolo contendere to, or is found guilty of, an Intentional
Program Violation in the Transitional Employment Assistance program will be ineligible for
further participation in the program for the following minimum time periods:
- For the first offense, one (1) year.
- For the second offense, two (2)years.
- For more than two, permanently.
In addition, the family will continue to be ineligible for TEA
assistance until the resulting overpayment has been repaid to the State with interest. |
Only IPVs committed against the Arkansas TEA program will be
considered in determining the applicable disqualification period in Arkansas.
For cases in which the family is currently receiving assistance, the
disqualification sanction period will begin no later than the second month following the
month in which the County Office received the decision. For cases in which the family is
not currently receiving assistance, the sanction period will begin with the first month
following the month the County Office received the decision.
|
| TEA Manual 7/1/97 |
8103 Fraudulent
Misrepresentation of Residence
| The family of an
individual who is convicted in a federal or state court of having made a fraudulent
statement or misrepresentation of residence in order to receive assistance simultaneously
from two (2) or more states will be ineligible to receive Transitional Employment
Assistance for a minimum period of ten (10) years beginning with the date of such
conviction. In addition, the family will continue to be
ineligible for TEA assistance until the resulting overpayment has been repaid to the State
with interest. |
|
| TEA Manual 7/1/97 |
8120 TEA Administrative
Disqualification Hearings
| The Appeals and Hearings
Section of the Office of Chief Counsel (OCC) conducts TEA Administrative Disqualification
Hearings and determines if intentional program violations have occurred. |
Administrative Disqualification Hearings will be conducted by a
hearing officer who has no involvement in the case.
|
| TEA Manual 7/1/97 |
8120.1 Criteria for
Conducting an Administrative Disqualification Hearing
Administrative Disqualification Hearings are conducted when
documentary evidence is available to substantiate one or more allegations that an
individual has committed an intentional program violation(s) and, as a result of the
alleged IPV, has erroneously obtained TEA payments.
A case will not be referred for a TEA Administrative
Disqualification Hearing if the total TEA overpayment resulting from the alleged IPV is
less than $400 unless the case is also being referred for a Food Stamp Administrative
Disqualification Hearing. If the case is referred for a Food Stamp Disqualification
Hearing and there is also a TEA overpayment, then it will be referred for a TEA
Disqualification as well, regardless of the amount of the TEA overpayment.
|
| TEA Manual 7/1/97 |
8120.2 Consolidation of
Hearings
TEA Administrative Disqualification Hearings may be combined with
other hearings, including Food Stamp Disqualification Hearings, if the factual issues
arise out of the same or related circumstances, and the individual receives prior notice
that the hearings will be combined. If hearings are combined, the time frames for
conducting Administrative Disqualification Hearings will be followed unless the household
waives the 30-day notice requirement for a disqualification hearing.
|
| TEA Manual 7/1/97 |
8120.3 Participation in the
TEA Program During the Hearing Process
| The County Office may not
disqualify an individual until the Appeals and Hearings Section finds that the individual
committed an intentional program violation. However, this does not preclude the County
Office from taking adverse action for other reasons. |
EXAMPLE: If a change in circumstances has occurred which will
adversely affect a TEA grant and such change was not reported timely, benefits will be
reduced based on the change even though a determination has not been made as to whether
the failure to report resulted from an intentional program violation.
|
| TEA Manual 7/1/97 |
8121 Referral by the
Overpayment Unit
A request for an Administrative Disqualification Hearing is
initiated by the Overpayment Unit of its own volition, at the request of the County
Office, or at the request of Fraud Investigations.
The County Office refers cases of suspected intentional program
violations to the Overpayment Unit via an Overpayment Report form. The Overpayment Unit
and Fraud Investigations will review the form and determine if the case is to be referred
(a) for possible prosecution; (b) for an Administrative Disqualification Hearing; or (c)
for non-fraud collection. If the Overpayment Unit refers the case for an Administrative
Disqualification Hearing, a copy of the referral will be sent to the County Office by the
Overpayment Unit.
|
| TEA Manual 7/1/97 |
8122 Preparation of the
Administrative Hearing File
An Administrative Hearing File must be prepared on cases referred
for an Administrative Disqualification Hearing. The Fraud Investigations Section will be
responsible for preparing the Hearing File for cases it has developed with a possible
intentional program violation (IPV). The County Office will be responsible for preparing
the Hearing File for all other cases referred for a Disqualification Hearing.
The Administrative Hearing File will contain:
- A completed DHS-1208 Food Stamp/TEA Intentional Program Violation
Statement; and
- Any supporting documentary evidence upon which the suspected IPV was
established. Examples of documentary evidence include applications, change report forms,
collateral statements, copies of award letters and verification of resources.
County Office
Upon receipt of the notification from the Overpayment Unit that
a case has been referred for an Administrative Disqualification Hearing, the County Office
will prepare the Administrative Hearing File. A copy of the File must be submitted to the
Appeals & Hearings Office within seven calendar days of receipt of the referral
notification. The original will be retained in the County Office.
Fraud Investigations
Fraud Investigations will prepare the Administrative Hearing
File for cases it has developed with a possible IPV. The hearing file will be forwarded to
the Overpayment Unit who will send copies of the file, including documentation gathered by
Fraud Investigations, to the County Office and to the Appeals and Hearings Section.
The case record and original applications will be returned to the
County Office by Fraud Investigations. Neither the case record nor the applications should
be destroyed as long as an Administrative Disqualification Hearing is pending.
It is the responsibility of the County Office to review this
information prior to the hearing and to present the evidence at the hearing. If any
questions arise after receipt of this documentation, the County Office should contact
Fraud Investigations prior to the date of the hearing to resolve the issue. The DHS-1208
will contain the name of the Fraud Investigator who prepared the case. If this individual
is needed for inquiry or testimony at the hearing, the County Office should contact the
Director, Fraud Investigations directly to request whatever assistance is needed.
|
| TEA Manual 7/1/97 |
8123 Waived Hearings
| Individuals accused of
committing an intentional program violation may waive their right to an Administrative
Disqualification Hearing. |
When a case is referred for an Administrative Disqualification
Hearing, the Appeals and Hearings Section must advise the individual that he/she may waive
his/her right to an Administrative Disqualification Hearing. The opportunity to sign a
waiver in lieu of a hearing is given to the accused individual prior to the date the
advance notice of a hearing is sent. If the individual does not sign a waiver by the date
specified on the notice, a hearing is scheduled.
If the waiver is signed by the accused individual, the appropriate
disqualification sanction will be imposed even if there is no admission to the charges.
The written waiver
notification must contain the following information:
- The date by which the signed waiver must be received by the Appeals
and Hearings Section.
- A signature blank for the accused individual and the caretaker
relative.
- A statement that the accused individual has the right to remain
silent concerning the charges and that anything said or written by the individual
concerning the charges may be used in a court of law.
- The fact that the signed waiver will result in disqualification for
the appropriate period of time even if the accused individual does not admit to the
charges.
- An opportunity for the accused person to admit the charges or to
waive the hearing without admitting to the charges.
- That the accused individual will be notified at least 30 days in
advance of the date the hearing is scheduled if he/she chooses not to waive the hearing.
|
The Appeals and Hearings Section uses a form titled "Waiver of
Right to an Administrative Disqualification Hearing" for this purpose. A copy of the
signed waiver is sent to the County Office upon receipt by the Appeals and Hearings
Section so that the appropriate disqualification sanction may be imposed. (Refer to
TEA 8402 & TEA 8430.)
Waivers Obtained by Fraud Investigations
The Fraud Investigations Section may also obtain a waiver to an
Administrative Disqualification Hearing from the accused individual during the course of
an investigation and prior to referral to the Appeals & Hearings Office. Form DHS-267,
Waiver of Hearing and Disqualification is used for this purpose. Upon receipt of a signed
DHS-267, Fraud Investigations will forward the form to the County Office so that the
appropriate disqualification sanction may be imposed. (Refer to TEA 8402 & TEA 8430.)
|
| TEA Manual 7/1/97 |
8124 Advance Notice &
Scheduling of Hearing
The Appeals and
Hearings Section must notify the accused individual at least 30 days in advance of the
date the hearing is scheduled. The notice must include the following information:
- The date, time and place of the hearing.
- The charges against the household member who is believed to have
committed the IPV.
- A summary of the evidence (Administrative Hearing File) and that it
may be examined at the County Office.
- A warning that if the accused individual fails to appear for the
hearing without good cause, the decision will be based solely on the evidence provided by
the County Office at the hearing.
- A statement that the accused individual may request a postponement of
the hearing provided that the request is made to the Appeals and Hearings Section at least
10 days prior to the date of the scheduled hearing and provided that the request is for
good cause.
- If the accused individual fails to appear and later requests that the
hearing be rescheduled, he/she must present good cause for failure to appear within 10
days of the date of the Hearing.
- Establishment of good cause will be at the discretion of the Appeals
and Hearings Section.
- A warning that if the hearing decision determines that an intentional
program violation has occurred, a disqualification period will be imposed according to the
following schedule: one year for the first violation; two years for the second violation;
and permanently for the third violation.
- A statement that the state or federal government may still prosecute
the household member in civil or criminal court action and collect the overissuances.
- A statement that the accused individual may contact the County Office
for the name and telephone number (if available) of a person who can give free legal
advice. If free legal advice is not available, the County Office will provide the number
of the lawyer referral service of the local bar association.
- A statement that the accused individual has the right to remain
silent concerning the charges and that anything said or signed by the individual
concerning the charges may be used in a court of law.
|
A statement attached to the notice contains a space
for the accused individual to name any persons he or she wishes to subpoena to present
testimony on his/her behalf at the hearing. A waiver of the right to subpoena witnesses is
also included.
The time and place of the hearing will be arranged so that it is
accessible to the member of the household suspected of the intentional program violation.
The advance notice is sent by certified mail, return mail, return
receipt requested. When the Appeals and Hearings Section has proof that the household
member accused of committing the IPV has received the advance notice of the hearing or has
refused such notice, then the notice requirements have been fulfilled and the hearing can
proceed. When neither proof of receipt nor proof of refusal exists and the household
member fails to appear, the Appeals and Hearings Section has not met its regulatory
obligation and cannot proceed with the hearing.
Postponement of Hearing
An accused individual may request a postponement of the
scheduled hearing if the request is made at least 10 days in advance of the scheduled
hearing and he/she shows good cause for the request. If the accused individual fails to
appear but advises the Appeals and Hearings Section not more than 10 days after the
hearing date, he/she may be permitted to show good cause for the failure to appear. The
Appeals and Hearings Section determines whether or not good cause exists. If good cause is
determined to exist, the hearing may be rescheduled within 30 days.
If the hearing is postponed, the time limits for processing will be
extended for the number of days between initial scheduling and rescheduling not to exceed
120 days. |
| TEA Manual 7/1/97 |
8125 Cancellation of a
Hearing by the County Office
If, at any time prior to the date of an Administrative
Disqualification Hearing, the County Office feels that there is insufficient evidence on
which to conduct a hearing, the Appeals and Hearings Section should be contacted
immediately so that the hearing can be canceled and the case administratively withdrawn.
This does not apply to cases prepared for a hearing by Fraud Investigations. The County
Office may not cancel a hearing for a case prepared by Fraud Investigations.
|
| TEA Manual 7/1/97 |
8126 Review of the
Administrative Disqualification File
When the advance notice of the hearing is sent, the accused
individual is advised that he/she has 10 calendar days from the date he/she signs the
certified mail receipt to review the Administrative File and request subpoenas. This
10-day limit applies only to the request for subpoenas. The accused individual and/or
caretaker relative may review the Administrative File anytime prior to, or during, the
Hearing. However, he/she may request subpoenas only during the 10 calendar days following
the date the certified mail receipt is signed.
The County Office will provide free copies of the Administrative
Hearing File if requested by the household or its representative.
|
| TEA Manual 7/1/97 |
8127 Requesting Subpoenas
The individual accused of the IPV, the County Office, or Fraud
Investigations may request that witnesses be subpoenaed to appear at an Administrative
Disqualification Hearing. The accused individual uses the attachment to the Advance Notice
of Hearing to request that subpoenas be issued. The County Office will be advised by
Appeals and Hearings of any witnesses the accused individual has requested and will have
five days from receipt of this notice to request rebuttal witnesses.
The County Office and/or Fraud Investigations may use the reverse
side of the County Statement (Form DHS-1208) to request subpoenas. If additional subpoenas
are needed by the County Office on cases prepared by Fraud Investigations, these may be
requested by contacting Appeals and Hearings.
The Office of Chief Counsel will issue the subpoenas pursuant to the
terms of agreement and authority of Ark. Code Ann. §20-76-408.
|
| TEA Manual 7/1/97 |
8128 The Administrative
Disqualification Hearing
8128.1 Attendance at Hearing
| The hearing shall be
attended by a representative of the County Office in the county of residence of the
accused individual, or the county of residence of the individual's representative. The
hearing may also be attended by friends and relatives upon request of the accused
individual. If space limitations exist, the Hearing Officer has the authority to limit the
number of persons in attendance at the hearing. |
|
| TEA Manual 7/1/97 |
8128.2 Rights of the Accused
Individual During the Hearing
During the hearing, the
accused individual has the right to:
- Examine the contents of his/her hearing file which includes all
documents and records to be used by the County Office at the hearing.
- Bring witnesses to present testimony on his/her behalf during the
hearing.
- Present his/her case or have it presented by legal counsel or other
person.
- Advance arguments without undue interference.
- Question or refute any testimony or evidence including the
opportunity to confront and cross examine adverse witnesses.
- Submit evidence to establish all relevant facts and evidence in the
case.
|
|
| TEA Manual 7/1/97 |
8128.3 Accused Individual's
Representative
The accused individual may designate in a signed statement the name
of a representative to act in his behalf in viewing the Hearing File and/or representing
him/her at the hearing. This statement must be contained in the Hearing File.
The designated representative will receive a copy of all
correspondence regarding the hearing proceedings.
|
| TEA Manual 7/1/97 |
8128.4 Role of the
Hearing Officer
The hearing officer will:
- Administer the oath to all witnesses who will present testimony.
- Request, receive, and make part of the record all relevant evidence.
- Advise the accused individual of his/her right to refuse to answer
questions during the hearing.
- Regulate the conduct and course of the hearing consistent with due
process to insure an orderly hearing.
- Order medical assessments at Department expense if necessary to
establish intent or lack of intent on the part of the accused individual.
|
| TEA Manual 7/1/97 |
8129 Hearing Decision
| The hearing officer will
prepare a decision based on the evidence presented. The format will consist of an
Introduction, Findings of fact, Conclusions of Law and a Decision. The final decision must be made within 90 days of the date of the advance
notice scheduling the hearing unless the hearing has been rescheduled and the time frames
have been extended in accordance with the provisions specified under the Advance Notice
provisions. |
|
| TEA Manual 7/1/97 |
8129.1 Absence of
Intentional Program Violation
If the decision is that an intentional program violation has not
occurred, the accused individual will be so advised by the Appeals and Hearings Section in
writing. A copy of the decision will be sent to the County Office, the Overpayment Unit,
and Fraud Investigations (only if this unit prepared the case for an Administrative
Disqualification Hearing).
|
| TEA Manual 7/1/97 |
8129.2 Finding of an
Intentional Program Violation
If is it determined that an intentional program violation occurred,
the accused individual will be advised of this finding by Appeals & Hearings. Two
copies of the decision will be sent to the County Office, one copy to the Overpayment Unit
and one copy to Fraud Investigations (only if this unit prepared the case for the
Administrative Disqualification Hearing).
NOTE: The decision is being sent to the accused individual
for information purposes only. The decision should also be attached to the notice of
imposition of disqualification sanction sent by the County Office.
|
| TEA Manual 7/1/97 |
8130 Imposing the
Disqualification Sanction
| When the County Office
receives a hearing decision finding that an intentional program violation has occurred, a
period of disqualification from the TEA program, will be imposed against the family. The disqualification periods are as follows:
- One (1) year for the first offense.
- Two (2) years for the second offense.
- For more than two, permanently.
In addition, the family will continue to be ineligible for TEA
assistance until the resulting overpayment has been repaid to the State with interest. |
Upon receipt of a hearing decision, the county office will take the
following actions:
- Establish a disqualification period that begins:
- No later than the second month following the month the County Office
received the decision if the family is currently receiving TEA; or
- With the first month following the month the decision was received if
the TEA case is closed.
- Complete and route Form DCO-56.
- Complete Form DCO-120, Notice of TEA Administrative Disqualification.
(NOTE: A "timely" notice, i.e., 10 day advance, is not required in this
situation.) This notice will be completed and routed to family even if the TEA case is
already closed.
|
| TEA Manual 7/1/97 |
8140 Court Imposed
Disqualifications
The County Office will disqualify a family if a member has been
found to have committed an intentional program violation by a court of law in accordance
with TEA 8102 & TEA
8130.
When a court finds that an individual has committed an IPV, Fraud
Investigations will inform the County Office by memo, with a copy to the Overpayment Unit.
The procedures relative to imposition of the disqualification are described in TEA 8130.
|