Agencies | Online Services | Policies
TEA Policy - 8100 Section
TEA Manual 7/1/97

8100 TEA Disqualifications - Intentional Program Violation

A determination of an intentional program violation (IPV) is made either through a court of law or by a hearing officer in an internal hearing process. The internal hearing is known as an Administrative Disqualification Hearing. Penalties in the form of disqualification sanctions are imposed against individuals found guilty of an IPV through a court of law or by a hearing officer in an Administrative Disqualification Hearing.

TEA Manual 7/1/97

8101 Definition of Intentional Program Violation (IPV)

An intentional program violation of the TEA Program is defined as an action by an individual for the purpose of establishing or maintaining the family’s eligibility for TEA or increasing or preventing a decrease in the amount of the grant which is intentionally:
  1. A false or misleading statement, misrepresentation, concealment, or withholding of facts; or
  2. Any act intended to mislead, misrepresent, conceal or withhold facts, or propound a falsity.

An IPV determination can be made only through the Administrative Disqualification Hearing process or by a court of law. County Office staff will not make IPV determinations.

TEA Manual 7/1/97

8102 Disqualification Sanction - Intentional Program Violation (IPV)

The family of any individual who pleads guilty or nolo contendere to, or is found guilty of, an Intentional Program Violation in the Transitional Employment Assistance program will be ineligible for further participation in the program for the following minimum time periods:
  1. For the first offense, one (1) year.
  2. For the second offense, two (2)years.
  3. For more than two, permanently.

In addition, the family will continue to be ineligible for TEA assistance until the resulting overpayment has been repaid to the State with interest.

Only IPVs committed against the Arkansas TEA program will be considered in determining the applicable disqualification period in Arkansas.

For cases in which the family is currently receiving assistance, the disqualification sanction period will begin no later than the second month following the month in which the County Office received the decision. For cases in which the family is not currently receiving assistance, the sanction period will begin with the first month following the month the County Office received the decision.

TEA Manual 7/1/97

8103 Fraudulent Misrepresentation of Residence

The family of an individual who is convicted in a federal or state court of having made a fraudulent statement or misrepresentation of residence in order to receive assistance simultaneously from two (2) or more states will be ineligible to receive Transitional Employment Assistance for a minimum period of ten (10) years beginning with the date of such conviction.

In addition, the family will continue to be ineligible for TEA assistance until the resulting overpayment has been repaid to the State with interest.

TEA Manual 7/1/97

8120 TEA Administrative Disqualification Hearings

The Appeals and Hearings Section of the Office of Chief Counsel (OCC) conducts TEA Administrative Disqualification Hearings and determines if intentional program violations have occurred.

Administrative Disqualification Hearings will be conducted by a hearing officer who has no involvement in the case.

TEA Manual 7/1/97

8120.1 Criteria for Conducting an Administrative Disqualification Hearing

Administrative Disqualification Hearings are conducted when documentary evidence is available to substantiate one or more allegations that an individual has committed an intentional program violation(s) and, as a result of the alleged IPV, has erroneously obtained TEA payments.

A case will not be referred for a TEA Administrative Disqualification Hearing if the total TEA overpayment resulting from the alleged IPV is less than $400 unless the case is also being referred for a Food Stamp Administrative Disqualification Hearing. If the case is referred for a Food Stamp Disqualification Hearing and there is also a TEA overpayment, then it will be referred for a TEA Disqualification as well, regardless of the amount of the TEA overpayment.

TEA Manual 7/1/97

8120.2 Consolidation of Hearings

TEA Administrative Disqualification Hearings may be combined with other hearings, including Food Stamp Disqualification Hearings, if the factual issues arise out of the same or related circumstances, and the individual receives prior notice that the hearings will be combined. If hearings are combined, the time frames for conducting Administrative Disqualification Hearings will be followed unless the household waives the 30-day notice requirement for a disqualification hearing.

TEA Manual 7/1/97

8120.3 Participation in the TEA Program During the Hearing Process

The County Office may not disqualify an individual until the Appeals and Hearings Section finds that the individual committed an intentional program violation. However, this does not preclude the County Office from taking adverse action for other reasons.

EXAMPLE: If a change in circumstances has occurred which will adversely affect a TEA grant and such change was not reported timely, benefits will be reduced based on the change even though a determination has not been made as to whether the failure to report resulted from an intentional program violation.

TEA Manual 7/1/97

8121 Referral by the Overpayment Unit

A request for an Administrative Disqualification Hearing is initiated by the Overpayment Unit of its own volition, at the request of the County Office, or at the request of Fraud Investigations.

The County Office refers cases of suspected intentional program violations to the Overpayment Unit via an Overpayment Report form. The Overpayment Unit and Fraud Investigations will review the form and determine if the case is to be referred (a) for possible prosecution; (b) for an Administrative Disqualification Hearing; or (c) for non-fraud collection. If the Overpayment Unit refers the case for an Administrative Disqualification Hearing, a copy of the referral will be sent to the County Office by the Overpayment Unit.

TEA Manual 7/1/97

8122 Preparation of the Administrative Hearing File

An Administrative Hearing File must be prepared on cases referred for an Administrative Disqualification Hearing. The Fraud Investigations Section will be responsible for preparing the Hearing File for cases it has developed with a possible intentional program violation (IPV). The County Office will be responsible for preparing the Hearing File for all other cases referred for a Disqualification Hearing.

The Administrative Hearing File will contain:

  1. A completed DHS-1208 Food Stamp/TEA Intentional Program Violation Statement; and
  2. Any supporting documentary evidence upon which the suspected IPV was established. Examples of documentary evidence include applications, change report forms, collateral statements, copies of award letters and verification of resources.

County Office

Upon receipt of the notification from the Overpayment Unit that a case has been referred for an Administrative Disqualification Hearing, the County Office will prepare the Administrative Hearing File. A copy of the File must be submitted to the Appeals & Hearings Office within seven calendar days of receipt of the referral notification. The original will be retained in the County Office.

Fraud Investigations

Fraud Investigations will prepare the Administrative Hearing File for cases it has developed with a possible IPV. The hearing file will be forwarded to the Overpayment Unit who will send copies of the file, including documentation gathered by Fraud Investigations, to the County Office and to the Appeals and Hearings Section.

The case record and original applications will be returned to the County Office by Fraud Investigations. Neither the case record nor the applications should be destroyed as long as an Administrative Disqualification Hearing is pending.

It is the responsibility of the County Office to review this information prior to the hearing and to present the evidence at the hearing. If any questions arise after receipt of this documentation, the County Office should contact Fraud Investigations prior to the date of the hearing to resolve the issue. The DHS-1208 will contain the name of the Fraud Investigator who prepared the case. If this individual is needed for inquiry or testimony at the hearing, the County Office should contact the Director, Fraud Investigations directly to request whatever assistance is needed.

TEA Manual 7/1/97

8123 Waived Hearings

Individuals accused of committing an intentional program violation may waive their right to an Administrative Disqualification Hearing.

When a case is referred for an Administrative Disqualification Hearing, the Appeals and Hearings Section must advise the individual that he/she may waive his/her right to an Administrative Disqualification Hearing. The opportunity to sign a waiver in lieu of a hearing is given to the accused individual prior to the date the advance notice of a hearing is sent. If the individual does not sign a waiver by the date specified on the notice, a hearing is scheduled.

If the waiver is signed by the accused individual, the appropriate disqualification sanction will be imposed even if there is no admission to the charges.

The written waiver notification must contain the following information:
  1. The date by which the signed waiver must be received by the Appeals and Hearings Section.
  2. A signature blank for the accused individual and the caretaker relative.
  3. A statement that the accused individual has the right to remain silent concerning the charges and that anything said or written by the individual concerning the charges may be used in a court of law.
  4. The fact that the signed waiver will result in disqualification for the appropriate period of time even if the accused individual does not admit to the charges.
  5. An opportunity for the accused person to admit the charges or to waive the hearing without admitting to the charges.
  6. That the accused individual will be notified at least 30 days in advance of the date the hearing is scheduled if he/she chooses not to waive the hearing.

The Appeals and Hearings Section uses a form titled "Waiver of Right to an Administrative Disqualification Hearing" for this purpose. A copy of the signed waiver is sent to the County Office upon receipt by the Appeals and Hearings Section so that the appropriate disqualification sanction may be imposed. (Refer to TEA 8402 & TEA 8430.)

Waivers Obtained by Fraud Investigations

The Fraud Investigations Section may also obtain a waiver to an Administrative Disqualification Hearing from the accused individual during the course of an investigation and prior to referral to the Appeals & Hearings Office. Form DHS-267, Waiver of Hearing and Disqualification is used for this purpose. Upon receipt of a signed DHS-267, Fraud Investigations will forward the form to the County Office so that the appropriate disqualification sanction may be imposed. (Refer to TEA 8402 & TEA 8430.)

TEA Manual 7/1/97

8124 Advance Notice & Scheduling of Hearing

The Appeals and Hearings Section must notify the accused individual at least 30 days in advance of the date the hearing is scheduled. The notice must include the following information:

  1. The date, time and place of the hearing.
  2. The charges against the household member who is believed to have committed the IPV.
  3. A summary of the evidence (Administrative Hearing File) and that it may be examined at the County Office.
  4. A warning that if the accused individual fails to appear for the hearing without good cause, the decision will be based solely on the evidence provided by the County Office at the hearing.
  5. A statement that the accused individual may request a postponement of the hearing provided that the request is made to the Appeals and Hearings Section at least 10 days prior to the date of the scheduled hearing and provided that the request is for good cause.
  6. If the accused individual fails to appear and later requests that the hearing be rescheduled, he/she must present good cause for failure to appear within 10 days of the date of the Hearing.
  7. Establishment of good cause will be at the discretion of the Appeals and Hearings Section.
  8. A warning that if the hearing decision determines that an intentional program violation has occurred, a disqualification period will be imposed according to the following schedule: one year for the first violation; two years for the second violation; and permanently for the third violation.
  9. A statement that the state or federal government may still prosecute the household member in civil or criminal court action and collect the overissuances.
  10. A statement that the accused individual may contact the County Office for the name and telephone number (if available) of a person who can give free legal advice. If free legal advice is not available, the County Office will provide the number of the lawyer referral service of the local bar association.
  11. A statement that the accused individual has the right to remain silent concerning the charges and that anything said or signed by the individual concerning the charges may be used in a court of law.

A statement attached to the notice contains a space for the accused individual to name any persons he or she wishes to subpoena to present testimony on his/her behalf at the hearing. A waiver of the right to subpoena witnesses is also included.

The time and place of the hearing will be arranged so that it is accessible to the member of the household suspected of the intentional program violation.

The advance notice is sent by certified mail, return mail, return receipt requested. When the Appeals and Hearings Section has proof that the household member accused of committing the IPV has received the advance notice of the hearing or has refused such notice, then the notice requirements have been fulfilled and the hearing can proceed. When neither proof of receipt nor proof of refusal exists and the household member fails to appear, the Appeals and Hearings Section has not met its regulatory obligation and cannot proceed with the hearing.

Postponement of Hearing

An accused individual may request a postponement of the scheduled hearing if the request is made at least 10 days in advance of the scheduled hearing and he/she shows good cause for the request. If the accused individual fails to appear but advises the Appeals and Hearings Section not more than 10 days after the hearing date, he/she may be permitted to show good cause for the failure to appear. The Appeals and Hearings Section determines whether or not good cause exists. If good cause is determined to exist, the hearing may be rescheduled within 30 days.

If the hearing is postponed, the time limits for processing will be extended for the number of days between initial scheduling and rescheduling not to exceed 120 days.

TEA Manual 7/1/97

8125 Cancellation of a Hearing by the County Office

If, at any time prior to the date of an Administrative Disqualification Hearing, the County Office feels that there is insufficient evidence on which to conduct a hearing, the Appeals and Hearings Section should be contacted immediately so that the hearing can be canceled and the case administratively withdrawn. This does not apply to cases prepared for a hearing by Fraud Investigations. The County Office may not cancel a hearing for a case prepared by Fraud Investigations.

TEA Manual 7/1/97

8126 Review of the Administrative Disqualification File

When the advance notice of the hearing is sent, the accused individual is advised that he/she has 10 calendar days from the date he/she signs the certified mail receipt to review the Administrative File and request subpoenas. This 10-day limit applies only to the request for subpoenas. The accused individual and/or caretaker relative may review the Administrative File anytime prior to, or during, the Hearing. However, he/she may request subpoenas only during the 10 calendar days following the date the certified mail receipt is signed.

The County Office will provide free copies of the Administrative Hearing File if requested by the household or its representative.

TEA Manual 7/1/97

8127 Requesting Subpoenas

The individual accused of the IPV, the County Office, or Fraud Investigations may request that witnesses be subpoenaed to appear at an Administrative Disqualification Hearing. The accused individual uses the attachment to the Advance Notice of Hearing to request that subpoenas be issued. The County Office will be advised by Appeals and Hearings of any witnesses the accused individual has requested and will have five days from receipt of this notice to request rebuttal witnesses.

The County Office and/or Fraud Investigations may use the reverse side of the County Statement (Form DHS-1208) to request subpoenas. If additional subpoenas are needed by the County Office on cases prepared by Fraud Investigations, these may be requested by contacting Appeals and Hearings.

The Office of Chief Counsel will issue the subpoenas pursuant to the terms of agreement and authority of Ark. Code Ann. §20-76-408.

TEA Manual 7/1/97

8128 The Administrative Disqualification Hearing

8128.1 Attendance at Hearing

The hearing shall be attended by a representative of the County Office in the county of residence of the accused individual, or the county of residence of the individual's representative. The hearing may also be attended by friends and relatives upon request of the accused individual. If space limitations exist, the Hearing Officer has the authority to limit the number of persons in attendance at the hearing.
TEA Manual 7/1/97

8128.2 Rights of the Accused Individual During the Hearing

During the hearing, the accused individual has the right to:
  1. Examine the contents of his/her hearing file which includes all documents and records to be used by the County Office at the hearing.
  2. Bring witnesses to present testimony on his/her behalf during the hearing.
  3. Present his/her case or have it presented by legal counsel or other person.
  4. Advance arguments without undue interference.
  5. Question or refute any testimony or evidence including the opportunity to confront and cross examine adverse witnesses.
  6. Submit evidence to establish all relevant facts and evidence in the case.
TEA Manual 7/1/97

8128.3 Accused Individual's Representative

The accused individual may designate in a signed statement the name of a representative to act in his behalf in viewing the Hearing File and/or representing him/her at the hearing. This statement must be contained in the Hearing File.

The designated representative will receive a copy of all correspondence regarding the hearing proceedings.

TEA Manual 7/1/97

8128.4 Role of the Hearing Officer

The hearing officer will:

  1. Administer the oath to all witnesses who will present testimony.
  2. Request, receive, and make part of the record all relevant evidence.
  3. Advise the accused individual of his/her right to refuse to answer questions during the hearing.
  4. Regulate the conduct and course of the hearing consistent with due process to insure an orderly hearing.
  5. Order medical assessments at Department expense if necessary to establish intent or lack of intent on the part of the accused individual.
TEA Manual 7/1/97

8129 Hearing Decision

The hearing officer will prepare a decision based on the evidence presented. The format will consist of an Introduction, Findings of fact, Conclusions of Law and a Decision.

The final decision must be made within 90 days of the date of the advance notice scheduling the hearing unless the hearing has been rescheduled and the time frames have been extended in accordance with the provisions specified under the Advance Notice provisions.

TEA Manual 7/1/97

8129.1 Absence of Intentional Program Violation

If the decision is that an intentional program violation has not occurred, the accused individual will be so advised by the Appeals and Hearings Section in writing. A copy of the decision will be sent to the County Office, the Overpayment Unit, and Fraud Investigations (only if this unit prepared the case for an Administrative Disqualification Hearing).

TEA Manual 7/1/97

8129.2 Finding of an Intentional Program Violation

If is it determined that an intentional program violation occurred, the accused individual will be advised of this finding by Appeals & Hearings. Two copies of the decision will be sent to the County Office, one copy to the Overpayment Unit and one copy to Fraud Investigations (only if this unit prepared the case for the Administrative Disqualification Hearing).

NOTE: The decision is being sent to the accused individual for information purposes only. The decision should also be attached to the notice of imposition of disqualification sanction sent by the County Office.

TEA Manual 7/1/97

8130 Imposing the Disqualification Sanction

When the County Office receives a hearing decision finding that an intentional program violation has occurred, a period of disqualification from the TEA program, will be imposed against the family.

The disqualification periods are as follows:

  • One (1) year for the first offense.
  • Two (2) years for the second offense.
  • For more than two, permanently.

In addition, the family will continue to be ineligible for TEA assistance until the resulting overpayment has been repaid to the State with interest.

Upon receipt of a hearing decision, the county office will take the following actions:

  1. Establish a disqualification period that begins:
  1. No later than the second month following the month the County Office received the decision if the family is currently receiving TEA; or
  2. With the first month following the month the decision was received if the TEA case is closed.
  1. Complete and route Form DCO-56.
  2. Complete Form DCO-120, Notice of TEA Administrative Disqualification. (NOTE: A "timely" notice, i.e., 10 day advance, is not required in this situation.) This notice will be completed and routed to family even if the TEA case is already closed.
TEA Manual 7/1/97

8140 Court Imposed Disqualifications

The County Office will disqualify a family if a member has been found to have committed an intentional program violation by a court of law in accordance with TEA 8102 & TEA 8130.

When a court finds that an individual has committed an IPV, Fraud Investigations will inform the County Office by memo, with a copy to the Overpayment Unit. The procedures relative to imposition of the disqualification are described in TEA 8130.